The Leaders and The Government
Feb 26th, 2008 | By oniger | Category: PersonalitiesWhen are still young and don’t know yet the circumstances of what is happening around us, we come to answer such inquiries with correct innocent answers, based of course on what was learned from school and influenced of the people around who had been with us through out our learning period.
We know also that a “good leader is also a good follower.” As we grow old, and begin to understand things, we still tend be confused because of the insufficient knowledge who had been injected to us by the environment and the people around us. We know less about a thing especially when it talks about legal matters and laws of technicality around a certain point of argument.
Our Leader in the government knew a lot of thing including these technical terms in which it is the basis of their action. These leaders who are suppose to help us and will mold the community into a peaceful place have been misled by some personal interests. But there are points in time that our leaders seem to overlook such things that suppose to be for the benefit of their constituents and of the whole people.
Within their term of services, there are points that some of these technical law terms are being violated as being pointed out by the opposition line and to be defended as well by the incumbent parties. Which is which then, as an ordinary people, we tend to be confused of these things, unless of course if you have personal knowledge on the event which an argument was started.
They are just people intended to commit mistakes after all – a very good excuse to the human race. Base on what these leaders are talking were for the benefits of the country. Yes it is actually, it will be for the people. This point of view is correct, unless the motive is truncated with some personal or political interest. This will be then the time for them to overlook the duties to be performed – the wellness of the people.
So, what now……. Who will be the next leaders to ease if not stop this perennial dispute about equality?